Skip to content
All about technology. — All about artificial intelligence.

Achieving genuine return on investment (ROI) in the Agentic AI Era requires more than just RAG scores

Increasing numbers of businesses are deploying AI agents or infusing purposeful AI technology within their systems. It's crucial for companies to scrutinize these advancements closely.

,   and  Administrator
2 min read
In the age of Agentic AI, mere Relationship Artificial Intelligence (RAG) falls short in delivering...
In the age of Agentic AI, mere Relationship Artificial Intelligence (RAG) falls short in delivering substantial Return on Investment (ROI).

Achieving genuine return on investment (ROI) in the Agentic AI Era requires more than just RAG scores

In the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence (AI), two key technologies have emerged as game-changers: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and AI agents. While both technologies leverage AI to generate responses, they differ significantly in their capabilities and applications, particularly in complex data analytics and enterprise return on investment (ROI).

Core Functionality

RAG is a technique that combines a large language model (LLM) with a retrieval system. This combination enables RAG to pull in relevant, up-to-date external data, generating accurate, context-rich responses. On the other hand, AI agents are autonomous programs designed to perform multi-step tasks, manage workflows, and dynamically interact with APIs, tools, and environments to accomplish complex goals.

Handling Complex Data Analytics

When it comes to handling complex data analytics, RAG is primarily suited for retrieving and generating responses based on large document corpora. However, it may struggle with multi-step synthesis or iterative reasoning across diverse data sources without user intervention. In contrast, AI agents are designed to handle complex workflows involving multiple steps, decisions, and data sources, with built-in memory hierarchies and fault tolerance for robust task execution.

Adaptability and Task Management

RAG's retrieval is mostly a single-shot process, and it may provide incomplete answers when queries are complex without iterative retrieval strategies. In contrast, AI agents can dynamically plan and adapt retrieval strategies, use multiple tools and APIs, and manage long-running tasks with state management, leading to more comprehensive and context-aware results.

Enterprise ROI Impact

RAG enhances the accuracy and freshness of AI outputs, thereby improving knowledge worker productivity, such as in smart chatbots and search assistants. However, its impact on complex decision-support scenarios is limited. AI agents, on the other hand, offer higher overall enterprise value by automating complex workflows, connecting disparate systems, and providing resilient, scalable AI-driven business processes that reduce manual effort and errors.

Limitations

RAG's success relies heavily on the quality of its indexing and retrieval pipelines. Silent failures in retrieval can lead to hallucinations and reduced trust. AI agents, while more complex to design initially, manage state and errors effectively, reducing overall failure rates.

Conclusion

RAG delivers enhanced factual accuracy and context by augmenting LLMs with external document retrieval, making it powerful for factual Q&A and single-turn interactions. However, it often falls short in handling complex, multi-step data synthesis or workflows common in enterprise analytics. In contrast, AI agents provide more advanced capabilities by orchestrating multi-step tasks, adapting dynamically, and integrating with external tools and APIs, thereby enabling more sophisticated analytics and automation that profoundly improve enterprise operational ROI.

This makes AI agents better suited for complex enterprise scenarios requiring context-aware decision-making and workflow automation, while RAG is ideal for up-to-date information retrieval and fact-based tasks with simpler interactions.

References:

  • ThinkAiCorp (2025) detailed comparison of agentic AI vs RAG[1].
  • Amazon Q Business explanation of RAG limitations in complex queries and agentic improvements (2025)[2].
  • Salesforce blog on AI agents and RAG failure modes and resilience (2025)[5].
  • SaM Solutions' overview of RAG architecture for enterprise use (2025)[4].
  • Alon Goren is the CEO and co-founder of AnswerRocket.

Read also:

Related

Latest