Tesla addresses rapper's widely shared video alleging that his Cybertruck broke down on the roadside
Article: Remote Repossession of Electric Vehicles: Fact or Fiction?
In the rapidly evolving world of automotive technology, the question of remote repossession of electric vehicles (EVs) has been a topic of interest and controversy. Recently, it was reported that Ford, not Tesla, applied for a patent to remotely repossess cars in cases of missed payments.
This development comes amidst ongoing discussions about the capabilities of automakers to interact with EVs, with the Tesla Cybertruck being a notable point of focus. A user of another brand posed a question about the possibility of automakers remotely interacting with electric vehicles, sparking further debate.
However, it's important to clarify that automakers generally do not legally or practically disable EVs remotely while they are in motion. Doing so would pose significant legal and safety risks, as it could potentially lead to accidents if the driver is suddenly stranded or put into danger.
Tesla, for instance, has never confirmed remotely disabling a moving vehicle for reasons like unauthorized use or non-payment. Claims of such actions, such as the alleged "Tesla Cybertruck deactivation," have been debunked as hoaxes. Tesla can remotely disable certain vehicle software features, but this does not extend to cutting power to a moving vehicle.
The legal risks of remotely shutting down a moving vehicle include liability for accidents caused by the sudden disabling of the vehicle. Major automakers avoid such actions, with remote disabling more likely restricted to stationary situations or when the vehicle is parked.
In the past, it was impossible for automakers to remotely interact with vehicles due to insufficient technology. However, today, thanks to advancements like Over The Air (OTA) updates, automakers are technically capable of controlling and interacting with EVs.
Amidst this debate, some Tesla users have suggested that the person who initially spread the false claims about Tesla's remote disabling capabilities should be sued for spreading fake news.
As legislation advances around autonomous vehicles, including trucks that might operate with minimal or no driver intervention, the focus remains on enabling automated driving safely and under regulatory frameworks, not on remotely disabling vehicles for security or enforcement purposes.
In conclusion, while some remote control features exist for vehicle management and anti-theft purposes, automakers do not legally disable EVs remotely while driving due to significant safety and legal constraints. The viral claims of such capabilities, particularly involving Tesla, have been confirmed as false by the company itself.
Read also:
- Elon Musk Acquires 26,400 Megawatt Gas Turbines for Powering His AI Project, Overlooks Necessary Permits for Operation!
- U Power's strategic collaborator UNEX EV has inked a Letter of Intent with Didi Mobility to deploy UOTTA(TM) battery-swapping electric vehicles in Mexico.
- Toyota strikes a deal in Shanghai for a solely owned Lexus electric vehicle production plant.
- Gold nanorod market to reach a value of USD 573.3 million by 2034, expanding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.7%
